The clinic application of mNGS and ENA-78 assays to identify intra-amniotic infection/inflammation

mNGS和ENA-78检测在识别羊膜腔内感染/炎症中的临床应用

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to explore whether metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and Epithelial Neutrophil Activating Peptide-78 (ENA-78) assays in the amniotic fluid (AF) of patients with preterm labor (PTL) could be employed for diagnosing intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (IAI/I) and predict the outcomes of emergency cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency(CI). METHODS: AF samples from 40 patients were subjected to PTL were subjected to mNGS and microbial culture to diagnose intra-amniotic infection known as microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC); ELISA was used to analyze ENA-78 levels for prediction of intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI). Pregnancy outcomes were compared, the predictive performance of mNGS and ENA-78 were assessed to evaluate the efficacy of emergency cervical cerclage. RESULTS: The diagnosis rate of MIAC was higher with mNGS (17.5%) compared to microbial culture (2.5%). AF ENA-78 levels were significantly higher in IAI patients than in non-IAI/I patients. ENA-78 demonstrated certain accuracy in identifying IAI, with sensitivity and specificity of 73.3% and 100%, respectively. Compared with non-IAI/I patients, patients with MIAC or IAI exhibited poor pregnancy outcomes after cervical cerclage. CONCLUSIONS: mNGS and ENA-78 assays are valuable means for assessing the state of infection/inflammation in the amniotic cavity and predicting the outcomes of emergency cerclage.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。