Professional collegiality and peer monitoring among nursing staff: an ethnographic study

护理人员的专业同僚情谊和同伴监督:一项民族志研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient safety and professional self-regulation systems both rely on professional colleagues to hold each other accountable for quality of care. OBJECTIVES: To understand how staff nurses manage variations in practices within the group, and negotiate the rules-in-use for quality of care, collegiality, and accountability. DESIGN/METHODS: Ethnographic case study; participant-observation, semi-structured interviews, policy analysis. SETTING: In-patient unit in an urban US teaching hospital. RESULTS: Explicit acknowledgment of conflicts and practice variations was perceived as risky to group cohesion. The dependence of staff on mutual assistance, and the absence of a system of group practice, led to the practice of "mutual deference", a strategy of reciprocal tolerance and non-interference that gave wide discretion to each nurse's decisions about care. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve professional accountability will need to address material constraints and the organization of nursing work, as well as communication and leadership skills.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。