Barriers and enablers of implementing spiritual care at the end of life: a mixed-methods systematic review using the theoretical domains framework

生命末期实施灵性关怀的障碍和促进因素:一项基于理论领域框架的混合方法系统评价

阅读:3

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aims to identify and synthesize current evidence on perceived barriers and enablers of implementing spiritual care in palliative care to end-of-life patients using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). METHODS: Reviewer screened records identified from six electronic databases—PubMed, Embase, CLNAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest and Cochrane library-and published before July 2025. Qualitative and quantitative records reporting data on the perspectives of patients, and healthcare providers towards implementing Spiritual Care at the end of life were included. Using a mixed methods appraisal tool, the quality of the included studies was assessed. Barriers and enablers were identified and then coded into domains of the theoretical domains framework (TDF) using a combination of deductive and inductive qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included 13 quantitative, 7 qualitative and 7mixed-method studies. Patient perspectives were reported in 7 studies, while healthcare providers’ viewpoints were documented in 23 studies. We identified barriers and enablers in the majority of TDF domains and two other themes that did not fit into the TDF: “Providers’ Spiritual Self-Care and Reflection” and “Provider-patient’ Longitudinal relationships”. There are 16 sub-themes related to barrier factors and 16 sub-themes related to enabler factors. No relevant barriers or enablers were identified in two of the 14 TDF domains-Memory, Attention and Decision Process, and Behavior Regulation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identified barriers and enablers of implementing spiritual care in palliative care to end-of-life patients. Successful implementation requires a paradigm shift from "end-of-life spiritual rescue" toward longitudinal spiritual integration. Clinicians must recognize their role as behavioral catalysts who bridge the gap between patient latent needs and perceived professional boundaries. Policy efforts should focus on multidisciplinary training, the structural normalization of spiritual metrics in clinical systems, and fostering relational continuity within healthcare delivery models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-026-02022-2.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。