Performance Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR and Next-Generation Sequencing for Circulating Tumor DNA Detection in Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer

液滴数字PCR与二代测序技术在非转移性直肠癌循环肿瘤DNA检测中的性能比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can potentially identify rectal cancer patients benefiting from neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. This study compared droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for ctDNA detection in localized rectal cancer before and after surgery. METHODS: Pre-therapy plasma and rectal tumor samples were collected from a development group (n = 41) and a validation group (n = 26). Mutations in tumor samples were identified using NGS, and ctDNA detection was performed with both ddPCR and NGS. Recurrence was assessed 1 year after surgery in the development group. RESULTS: In the development group, ddPCR detected ctDNA in 24/41 (58.5%) and NGS panel in 15/41 (36.6%; p = 0.00075) of the baseline plasma. In the validation group, 21/26 (80.8%) patients had detectable ctDNA in the pre-therapy plasma. A positive ctDNA result was associated with higher clinical tumor stage and with lymph node positivity as detected by MRI. Postoperative ddPCR did not detect ctDNA before most recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a practical oligomarker ctDNA test for localized rectal cancer suitable for clinical workflow, and that ddPCR detects ctNA from pre-therapy plasma at a satisfactory level in advanced rectal cancers. Detecting ctDNA with ddPCR may help to assess the local severity, but the clinical utility of this approach should be evaluated in clinical trials.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。