Abstract
Purpose To determine whether photon-counting CT (PCCT) acquisition of whole-body CT images provides similar quantitative image quality and reader satisfaction for multiple myeloma screening at lower radiation doses than does standard energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. Materials and Methods Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance prospectively underwent clinical noncontrast whole-body CT with EID and same-day PCCT (August-December 2021). Five axial scan locations were evaluated by seven radiologists, with 11% (eight of 70) of images including osteolytic lesions. Images were shown in randomized order, and each reader rated the following: discernibility of the osseous cortex and osseous trabeculae, perceived image noise level, and diagnostic confidence. Presence of lytic osseous lesions was indicated. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were calculated. Comparisons were made using paired t tests and mixed linear effects models. Results Seven participants (four women) were included (mean age, 66 years ± 9 [SD]; body mass index, 30.1 kg/m(2) ± 5.2). Mean cortical definition, trabecular definition, image noise, and image quality scores were 83, 67, 75, and 78 versus 84, 66, 74, and 76 for EID and PCCT, respectively (P = .65, .11, .26, and .11, respectively). PCCT helped identify more lesions (79% [22 of 28]) than did EID (64% [18 of 28]). CNRs and SNRs were similar between modalities. PCCT had lower radiation doses than EID (volume CT dose index: EID, 11.37 ± 2.8 vs PCCT, 1.8 ± 0.6 [P = .06]; dose-length product: EID, 1654.1 ± 409.6 vs PCCT, 253.4 ± 89.6 [P = .05]). Conclusion This pilot investigation suggests that PCCT affords similar quantitative and qualitative scores as EID at significantly lower radiation doses. Keywords: CT, CT-Spectral, Skeletal-Axial, Spine, Hematologic Diseases, Whole-Body Imaging, Comparative Studies Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.