Biomechanical comparison of a novel hockey-stick locking plate with a pes anserinus sparing design for Schatzker IV tibial plateau fractures

新型曲棍球杆形锁定钢板与保留鹅足设计的钢板在Schatzker IV型胫骨平台骨折中的生物力学比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stable fixation of Schatzker IV tibial plateau fractures is crucial for functional recovery. Conventional plating techniques can compromise the pes anserinus tendon. This study biomechanically evaluates a novel hockey-stick locking plate (NHLP), which features a pes anserinus sparing design, against a traditional T-shaped locking plate (TTLP) and a double reconstruction locking plate (DRLP). METHODS: Eighteen synthetic tibiae (Sawbones) with a standardized Schatzker IV fracture model were randomly assigned to three fixation groups (NHLP, TTLP, DRLP; n = 6/group). All constructs underwent quasi-static compression, cyclic loading, and load to failure testing. Construct stiffness, interval and cumulative displacement, changes in fracture gap and articular step-off, and ultimate failure load were measured. RESULTS: The NHLP construct demonstrated significantly lower stiffness and a lower ultimate failure load compared to the TTLP and DRLP. During cyclic loading, no significant differences were observed in interval displacement among the groups; however, the cumulative displacement of the NHLP group was significantly greater than the other two (P < 0.001). All three constructs effectively maintained the articular surface, with no significant differences in fracture gap or anterior/central step-off. For posterior articular step-off, the NHLP provided superior control compared to the TTLP (P < 0.001) and was comparable to the DRLP. CONCLUSION: In this biomechanical study of a Schatzker IV fracture model, the NHLP demonstrated lower overall stiffness and strength than conventional plates but provided superior stabilization of the posterior articular surface. The construct's ultimate strength was found to be sufficient for expected early postoperative physiological loads. The NHLP represents a biomechanically viable option for this fracture pattern, particularly given its design feature of sparing the pes anserinus. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。