Comparison of Coflex dynamic stabilization with bacfuse static stabilization for lumbar degenerative disease

Coflex动态稳定与Bacfuse静态稳定治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy between BacFuse static interlaminar stabilization and Coflex dynamic interlaminar stabilization in patients with lumbar degenerative disease. METHODS: Sixty-one patents with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent Coflex and BacFuse interlaminar stabilization were included. Patient follow-up was conducted 1, 6, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Visual analog scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire scores were significantly improved after surgery in both groups. Anterior disc height, posterior disc height, and foramina height at the targeted segment increased after surgery in the BacFuse group by 11.69%, 22.88%, and 19.62%, respectively. Between the 1- and 24-month follow-ups, mean disc height of the segment superior to the target decreased from 18.92 ± 1.68 mm to 18.65 ± 1.94 mm in the Coflex group and from 19.52 ± 1.58 mm to 19.07 ± 1.40 mm in the BacFuse group (P < 0.05). No new symptoms developed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: BacFuse is a safe and effective alternative to Coflex interlaminar stabilization in patients with lumbar degenerative disease.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。