Table Slide Shoulder Flexion test for early assessment following proximal humeral fracture: development and reliability

用于近端肱骨骨折早期评估的肩关节屈曲试验:开发与可靠性

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures are common in older people, often resulting in pain and reduced shoulder range of motion, which impacts daily activities. Although early exercises are recommended to improve function, reliable methods for assessing shoulder range of motion in the early post-fracture phase are lacking. This study aimed to develop a method for measuring shoulder flexion early after non-surgically treated proximal humeral fractures and to assess its test-retest reliability. METHODS: The novel Table Slide Shoulder Flexion test was piloted on 17 individuals, among them physiotherapists providing feedback. Within-day test-retest reliability was assessed by a single tester using an electronic goniometer. Shoulder flexion was measured in 37 patients (mean age 62 years, 86% women) with non-surgically treated proximal humeral fractures, 1-9 weeks post-injury. The goniometer was placed both in high-thoracic and mid-thoracic positions for reliability comparisons. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) were calculated. RESULTS: The method was deemed unsuitable for two patients, and one dropped out. In the remaining 34, ICC (2,1) reached 0.932 for the high-thoracic goniometer position and 0.926 for the mid-thoracic position when performing two table slides, with both values increasing further when three repetitions were performed. High-thoracic measurements slightly outperformed mid-thoracic measurements, achieving a MDC of 19° at the third repetition, compared to 20° for the third mid-thoracic repetition. Measured high-thoracic shoulder flexion ranged from 58-178°. CONCLUSION: The novel Table Slide Shoulder Flexion test is a reliable tool for measuring shoulder flexion in the early phase after proximal humeral fractures. It may be useful for tracking individual changes over time and as an outcome measure in group comparisons research. Further studies are needed to investigate its intertester reliability, responsiveness, and validity.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。