A comparison of efficacy and safety of oral versus intravenous applications of tranexamic acid in total hip and knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

比较口服与静脉注射氨甲环酸在全髋关节和全膝关节置换术中的疗效和安全性:一项更新的随机对照试验系统评价荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been extensively used in total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) to reduce blood loss. The commonly investigated routes of TXA administration include oral, intravenous, intra-articular, and topical methods. However, the ideal route of administration remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which updated on October 2024. Decline of hemoglobin (DHB), total blood loss (TBL), length of hospital stays (HS), intra-operative blood loss (IBL), operative time, transfusion rate, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and intramuscular venous thrombosis (IVT) were extracted and analyzed. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for each outcome based on the degree of heterogeneity. Furthermore, we assessed publication bias through funnel plots, Egger tests and the trim-and-fill method. The study adhered to PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. All of the analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 2,262 patients from 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of decline of hemoglobin (P = 0.95), total blood loss(P = 0.59), length of hospital stays (P = 0.28), intra-operative blood loss (P = 0.64), operative time (P = 0.67), transfusion rate (P = 0.96), deep vein thrombosis (P = 0.14), intramuscular venous thrombosis (P = 0.14) between the oral and intravenous groups. But five studies reported that oral TXA has lower cost than intravenous. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provided updated evidence that suggests oral and intravenous TXA have similar efficacy and safety. However, oral tranexamic acid can reduce financial burden of joint replacement on patients. So more high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm that oral may be the ideal route of administration for TXA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-025-09193-8.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。