Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the differences in mechanical stability of OTA/AO 31A1.3 intertrochanteric fractures under various reduction conditions. METHODS: Twenty standard synbone artificial femur test bones were selected for the OTA/AO 31A1.3 intertrochanteric fracture model. The models were divided into five groups according to their reduction state: positive support, neutral support, negative support, varus fixation, and valgus fixation, with four specimens in each group. All models were fixed using PFNA intramedullary fixation and subjected to static axial compression tests. The subsidence displacement of the proximal femur under different loads and the axial stiffness of the model were measured to verify the mechanical stability of the OTA/AO 31A1.3 intertrochanteric fracture under different reduction conditions. RESULTS: After the static axial compression test, the proximal femoral subsidence displacement in the positive support and neutral support groups was lower than that in the negative support, valgus fixation, and varus fixation groups (p < 0.001). The axial stiffness of the model was highest in the positive support group. Significant differences in subsidence displacement and axial stiffness were found between the groups (p < 0.001). The positive support group demonstrated the best mechanical stability, while the varus fixation group showed the poorest performance. CONCLUSION: Positive support of the medial cortex can be regarded as the best reduction state for OTA/AO 31A1.3 intertrochanteric fractures, suggesting that this approach should be preferred during surgery to enhance mechanical stability and improve clinical outcomes. Conversely, varus fixation should be avoided due to its inferior stability.