Evaluating the reliability of the lateral femoral condyle measuring methods by different modalities for patients with lateral patellar dislocation

评估不同测量方法对髌骨外侧脱位患者股骨外侧髁测量结果的可靠性

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A variety of measurement methods and imaging modalities are in use to quantify the morphology of lateral femoral condyle (LFC), but the most reliable method remains elusive in patients with lateral patellar dislocation (LPD). The purpose of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reliability of different measurement methods for evaluating the morphology of LFC on different imaging modalities in patients with LPD. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with LPD were included. Four parameters for quantifying the morphology of LFC were retrospectively measured by three observers on MRI, sagittal CT image, conventional radiograph (CR), and three-dimensional CT (3D-CT). The intra-class correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the intra- and inter-observer reliability. Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to identify the bias between observers. RESULTS: The lateral femoral condyle index (LFCI) showed better intra- and inter-observer reliability on MRI and 3D-CT than on CR and sagittal CT images. The mean difference in the LFCI between observers was lowest on 3D-CT (0.047), higher on MRI (0.053), and highest on sagittal CT images (0.062). The LFCI was associated with the lateral femoral condyle ratio (ρ = 0.422, P = 0.022), lateral condyle index (r = 0.413, P = 0.037), and lateral femoral condyle distance (r = 0.459, P = 0.014). The LFCI could be reliably measured by MRI and 3D-CT. CONCLUSION: The LFCI could be reliably measured by MRI and 3D-CT. The LFCI was associated with both the height and length of LFC and could serve as a comprehensive parameter for quantifying the morphology of LFC in patients with LPD.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。