Mucosal vaccination with outer membrane vesicles derived from Bordetella pertussis reduces nasal bacterial colonization after experimental infection

用源自百日咳杆菌的外膜囊泡进行黏膜疫苗接种可减少实验感染后的鼻腔细菌定植

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We previously identified Bordetella pertussis-derived outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) as a promising immunogen for improving pertussis vaccines. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of our vaccine prototype in immunization strategies aimed at reducing disease transmission by targeting colonization in the upper airways while maintaining protection against severe disease by reducing colonization in the lower respiratory tract. METHODS: We assessed different mucosal administration strategies in a murine model, including homologous mucosal 2-dose prime-boost schedules and heterologous prime-boost strategies combining intramuscular (IM) systemic immunization with mucosal routes (intranasal, IN; or sublingual, SL). We utilized alum and c-di-AMP as adjuvants for the systemic and mucosal formulations of the OMV vaccine prototype, respectively. A homologous prime/boost IM immunization schedule and commercial vaccines were used for comparisons. RESULTS: All tested heterologous schemes induced higher levels of specific IgG with significant avidity, as well as higher levels of IgG1 and IgG2c, compared to the corresponding homologous prime-boost 2-dose schemes via mucosal routes (OMV(IN-IN) or OMV(SL-SL)). High IgA levels were observed post-B. pertussis challenge following OMV(IN-IN) treatments and heterologous treatments where the second dose was administered via a mucosal route (prime-pull scheme). Furthermore, schemes involving the intranasal route, whether in a homologous or heterologous scheme, induced the highest levels of IL-17 and IFN-γ. Accordingly, these schemes showed superior efficacy against nasal colonization than the commercial vaccines. Homologous intranasal immunization exhibited the highest protective capacity against nasal colonization while maintaining an excellent level of protection in the lower respiratory tract. To further enhance protection against nasal colonization, we performed a comparative analysis of formulations containing either single or combined adjuvants, administered via homologous intranasal route. These assays revealed that the use of alum combined with c-di-AMP, did not enhance the immune protective capacity in comparison with that observed for the formulation containing c-di-AMP alone. CONCLUSIONS: All the experiments presented here demonstrate that the use of OMVs, regardless of the scheme applied (except for OMV(SL-SL)), significantly outperformed acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, achieving a higher reduction in bacterial colonization in the upper respiratory tract (p<0.01).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。