Comparing the Accuracy of Standard Equations to Predict Glomerular Filtration Rate for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury: Which Is the "Best Fit?"

比较标准方程预测脊髓损伤患者肾小球滤过率的准确性:哪个才是“最佳拟合”?

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at increased risk of renal insufficiency, so their renal function must regularly be monitored. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment is challenging as it requires measuring clearance of exogenous markers, which is impractical in most clinical settings. Thus, equations have been formulated to estimate GFR that utilize serum creatinine (Cr) or cystatin C (CysC). OBJECTIVES: Given loss of muscle mass after SCI, we hypothesized equations using CysC would be more accurate than those using Cr after SCI. METHODS: Fifty-eight persons (51 male/7 female; age 22-87 years) with SCI level C2-L1/AIS A-D were enrolled. Serum CysC and Cr, 24-hour urine creatinine (24hrUCr) and 24-hour urine urea (24hrUurea) were collected. Average of the 24hrUCr clearance and 24hrUurea clearance was calculated (AvgCl(CrUr)). Six GFR estimating equations were compared to AvgCl(CrUr). For each equation, mean bias (AvgCl(CrUr) - eGFR) was calculated followed by the Pearson correlation calculation between AvgCl(CrUr) and eGFR. In addition, the percentage of estimated values within 15%, 30%, and 50% of AvgCl(CrUr) values are reported for each estimating equation. RESULTS: 2012 CKD-EPI CysC equation (bias 9.32 mg/dL, 95% CI, -1.23 to -17.41) was the most accurate predictor of GFR. This model accurately predicted GFR of 81%, 57%, and 33% within ±50%, ±30%, and ±15% of the AvgCl(CrUr), respectively. Conclusion: In persons with SCI, the CKD-EPI 2012 CysC equation, which uses cystatin C rather than creatinine, is the most accurate of the six equations tested in estimating GFR in persons with SCI.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。