Efficacy and influencing factors of immunosuppressive therapy combined with or without eltrombopag in children with severe aplastic anemia

免疫抑制疗法联合或不联合艾曲波帕治疗重型再生障碍性贫血患儿的疗效及影响因素

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of eltrombopag (EPAG) combined with standard immunosuppressive therapy (IST), EPAG with cyclosporine or cyclosporine alone in children with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). METHODS: This is a retrospective study. The patients were categorized as three groups: Group A (EPAG + rabbit antithymocyte globulin + cyclosporine, n = 12), Group B (EPAG + cyclosporine, n = 13), and Group C (cyclosporine alone, n = 16). The overall remission rate (ORR) of each group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the ORR among Groups A, B, and C at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (P > 0.05). The incidence rates of adverse reactions in each group at 6 months were 36.4% (4/11), 58.3% (7/12), and 69.2% (9/13), respectively (P = 0.264). Patients with a duration from diagnosis to receiving EPAG treatment of ≤ 60 days, a diagnosis of SAA, a platelet (PLT) count ≥ 15 × 10(9)/L, a white blood cell (WBC) count of ≥ 2.0 × 10(9)/L, N% of ≥ 40%, a lymphocyte count of ≥ 1.0 × 10(9)/L, and a CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio of ≥ 1.5 were more likely to achieve a hematopoietic response. No clonal evolution was observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: EPAG combined with IST shows comparable efficacy to cyclosporine alone in children with SAA, along with a favorable safety profile. Patients with earlier initiation of EPAG and preserved residual hematopoietic function are more likely to achieve remission, without serious adverse reactions or significant clonal evolution.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。