Intrathecal versus intravenous umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for ischemic stroke sequelae

鞘内注射与静脉注射脐带间充质干细胞治疗缺血性卒中后遗症的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of death worldwide. Traditional treatments have limitations, stem cell therapy has potential for regeneration after ischemic stroke. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell (UC-MSC) infusion via the intravenous (IV) and intrathecal (IT) routes for treating neurological sequelae after ischemic stroke. METHODS: This phase II randomized controlled trial involved 32 patients aged 40-75 years with neurological sequelae after ischemic stroke. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: 16 received two IT UC-MSC infusions plus rehabilitation therapy, and 16 received two IV UC-MSC infusions plus rehabilitation therapy. Additionally, 16 matched controls, paired with the IT group by sex, age (±5 years), and NIHSS, received only rehabilitation. UC-MSCs were administered at 1.5 × 106 cells/kg at baseline and 3 months. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months using NIHSS, FIM, MAS, FMS, and SF-36. RESULTS: No severe adverse events related to UC-MSC therapy were observed. Adverse event rate was lower in the IV group than the IT group. At 6 months, the IV group demonstrated significant improvements in NIHSS (p = 0.046), FIM (p = 0.028), and SF-36 (p < 0.001). At 12 months, both UC-MSC groups showed significant improvements, with greater effects in the IV group (p < 0.001 for SF-36). CONCLUSION: Both IV and IT UC-MSC infusions improved neurological recovery and quality of life, with fewer adverse events in the IT group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05292625.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。