Are Intravenous Immunoglobulins Effective in Preventing Primary EBV Infection in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients?

静脉注射免疫球蛋白能否有效预防儿童肾移植受者发生原发性EB病毒感染?

阅读:3

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with donor/recipient mismatch (D+/R-) carries the highest risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Current prophylactic strategies are not standardized. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), containing anti-EBV antibodies, have been proposed as a potential preventive option, but evidence is lacking. This single-center retrospective case-control study evaluated the efficacy of serial IVIG administration in preventing primary EBV infection and promoting long-term immunity in this high-risk population. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 26 pediatric kidney transplant recipients (age 1-18 years) with EBV D+/R- mismatch and a median follow-up of 7.5 years. Fourteen patients received scheduled IVIG infusions (200 mg/kg monthly for six months post-transplantation), while twelve received no EBV-directed prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of primary EBV infection, defined as EBV-DNA > 1000 copies/mL in peripheral blood. The secondary endpoint was Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen-Immunoglobulin G (EBNA-IgG) seroconversion. Results: Patients receiving IVIG were significantly younger than controls (median age 4.2 vs. 10.8 years, p = 0.01). No significant variations were observed between groups in renal function or immunosuppressive levels during follow-up. IVIG prophylaxis was unexpectedly linked to a higher cumulative incidence of EBV infection compared with controls (64% vs. 25%, p = 0.047). Time-to-event analysis confirmed an increased, although not statistically significant, risk of EBV acquisition in the IVIG group (Hazard Ratio [HR] 3.24, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.87-12.01; p = 0.079). EBV-specific immunity, assessed by EBNA-IgG seroconversion, was comparable between groups (HR 1.78; p = 0.45), confirming no immunological advantage of IVIG. One IVIG-treated patient (7.1%) developed PTLD, while none did in the control group. Conclusions: Scheduled IVIG administration during the first six months after transplantation does not constitute an effective strategy to prevent primary EBV infection or to enhance long-term immunity in high-risk EBV D+/R- pediatric kidney recipients and may even increase susceptibility to viral acquisition. These findings argue against the use of IVIG as EBV prophylaxis in this population.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。