Comparative efficacy and safety of modified BEAM and BEAM/BEAC as conditioning regimens for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

改良版 BEAM 方案和 BEAM/BEAC 方案作为自体造血干细胞移植预处理方案治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的疗效和安全性比较

阅读:1

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy and safety of the modified BEAM (mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome replacing melphalan) versus BEAM/BEAC as a conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The data source for the modified BEAM regimen was obtained from a prospective, single-arm study (NCT05681403), while the BEAM/BEAC regimen was retrospectively collected from an electronic health record-derived external control group. Primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Eighty-three patients were included, with 34 in the modified BEAM group, 23 in the BEAM group, and 26 in the BEAC group. The median times were 10.5, 9.0, and 9.0 days for neutrophil engraftment, and 10.5, 10.0, and 10.0 days for platelet engraftment, respectively. Oral mucositis (14.7%, 21.7%, and 7.7%), nausea (8.8%, 17.4%, and 0.0%), and diarrhea (5.9%, 8.2%, and 0.0%) were the most common grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities in three groups. No treatment-related death was reported. Besides, no significant differences were observed in 2-year CIR (9.4%, 26.6%, and 23.6%), progression-free survival (90.6%, 73.4%, and 76.4%), and overall survival (97.1%, 87.0%, and 88.5%) rates among three groups (all P > 0.05). The modified BEAM conditioning regimen may have comparable efficacy and safety with the BEAM/BEAC regimen in treating patients with NHL.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。