Sirolimus vs paclitaxel-coated balloons in in-stent coronary restenosis: A meta-analysis

西罗莫司与紫杉醇涂层球囊治疗支架内冠状动脉再狭窄:一项荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a persistent challenge after percutaneous coronary intervention, with drug-coated balloons such as sirolimus-coated balloons (SCBs) and paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) being key treatment options. However, data comparing their efficacy and safety are limited. AIM: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of SCBs vs PCBs in patients with coronary ISR. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect was conducted from inception to May 2025, following Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing SCBs and PCBs in adults with coronary ISR, reporting outcomes like target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and myocardial infarction. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I (2) statistic, and study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Four studies (three randomized controlled trials and one observational study) were analyzed. No significant differences were found between SCBs and PCBs for TLR (RR 1.22, 95%CI: 0.72-2.06, P = 0.75, I (2) = 0%), MACE (RR 1.15, 95%CI: 0.70-1.90, P = 0.80, I (2) = 0%), stent thrombosis (RR 1.01, 95%CI: 0.57-1.78, P = 0.61, I (2) = 0%), all-cause mortality (RR 0.67, 95%CI: 0.11-4.06, P = 0.69, I (2) = 0%), cardiac mortality (RR 1.28, 95%CI: 0.16-10.28, P = 0.77, I (2) = 0%), or myocardial infarction (RR 0.99, 95%CI: 0.10-9.44, P = 0.35, I (2) = 0%). Studies had low to moderate risk of bias, with consistent treatment effects. CONCLUSION: SCBs and PCBs show similar efficacy and safety for coronary ISR, allowing flexible use based on availability and patient needs. Future studies should explore long-term outcomes and high-risk groups to optimize ISR management.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。