Physical Training and Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

囊性纤维化患者的体能训练和肺康复:临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Physical training and Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials. Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical training are essential components of the comprehensive management of patients with cystic fibrosis. Despite documented benefits for some clinical outcomes, uncertainty exists regarding their overall effects. Therefore, the objective of the present meta-analysis is to determine the effectiveness of physical training and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with CF. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials published between 1990 and 2025 was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Clinical Trial, SCOPUS, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scielo, and LILAC databases. The risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2 tool, the quality of the evidence with the Jadad scale, and the certainty of the evidence for each outcome was assessed according to GRADE guidelines. This meta-analysis was developed using the statistical packages RevMan 5.4(®) and Jamovi 2.3.28(®). RESULTS: Twenty-three studies with a total of 800 patients with CF were included. This meta-analysis showed that pulmonary rehabilitation and physical training did not affect pulmonary function, as observed in FEV1 (SMD: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.20; p = 0.46) and FVC (SMD: 0.11; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.27; p = 0.14). However, it has a discrete impact on exercise capacity, producing an increase in VO(2) max (MD: 2.74; 95% CI: 0.43 to 5.04; p = 0.02). Subgroup analyses did not yield relevant findings, and sensitivity analyses did not produce modifications in the direction or magnitude of the effect. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention evaluated in this meta-analysis does not have effects on pulmonary function but may influence exercise capacity, particularly VO(2) max. It is recommended to interpret the findings with caution due to the limited certainty of the available evidence.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。