Abstract
Authentic DNA sequences are crucial for reliable evolutionary inference. Concerns about the identification of DNA sequences have been voiced several times in the past but few quantitative studies exist. Mitogenomes play important roles in phylogenetics, phylogeography, population genetics, and DNA identification. However, the large number of mitogenomes being published routinely, often in brief data papers, has raised questions about their authenticity. In this study, we quantify problematic mitogenomes of birds and their reusage in other papers. Of 1,876 complete or partial mitogenomes of birds published until January 1, 2020, the authenticity of 1,559 could be assessed with sequences of conspecifics. Of these, 78 (5.0%) were found to be problematic, including 45 curated reference sequences. Problems were due to misidentification (33), chimeras of two or three species (23), sequencing errors/numts (18), incorrect sequence assembly (1), mislabeling at GenBank but not in the final paper (2), or vice versa (1). The number of problematic mitogenomes has increased sharply since 2012. Worryingly, these problematic sequences have been reused 436 times in other papers, including 385 times in phylogenies. No less than 53% of all mitogenomic phylogenies/networks published until January 1, 2020 included at least one problematic mitogenome. Problematic mitogenomes have resulted in incorrect phylogenetic hypotheses and proposals for unwarranted taxonomic revision, and may have compromised comparative analyses and measurements of divergence times. Our results indicate that a major upgrade of quality control measures is warranted. We propose a comprehensive set of measures that may serve as a new standard for publishing mitogenome sequences.