Analysis of Evaporative and Exhaust-Related On-Board Diagnostic (OBD) Readiness Monitors and DTCs Using I/M and Roadside Data

利用I/M和路边数据分析蒸发排放和排气相关的车载诊断(OBD)就绪状态监控器和故障诊断码(DTC)

阅读:1

Abstract

Under contract to the EPA, Eastern Research Group analyzed light-duty vehicle OBD monitor readiness and diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) using inspection and maintenance (I/M) data from four states. Results from roadside pullover emissions and OBD tests were also compared with same-vehicle I/M OBD results from one of the states. Analysis focused on the evaporative emissions control (evap) system, the catalytic converter (catalyst), the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system and the oxygen sensor and oxygen sensor heater (O(2) system). Evap and catalyst monitors had similar overall readiness rates (90% to 95%), while the EGR and O(2) systems had higher readiness rates (95% to 98%). Approximately 0.7% to 2.5% of inspection cycles with a "ready" evap monitor had at least one stored evap DTC, but DTC rates were under 1% for the catalyst and EGR systems, and under 1.1% for the O(2) system, in the states with enforced OBD programs. Monitor readiness decreased, and DTC rates increased, as vehicles aged. DTCs were typically limited to a small subset of all possible DTCs for any particular system. For the on-road versus I/M analysis, lower overall readiness rates and higher overall DTC rates occurred during the roadside test than during the I/M test, and the prevalence of roadside DTCs was shown to decrease around the time of the vehicle's I/M test, possibly indicating some positive I/M influence of reducing on-road DTCs. Roadside Acceleration Simulation Mode (ASM) fail rates also decreased around the time of the I/M test, suggesting a positive influence of I/M programs on reducing vehicle emissions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。