Clinical Outcomes After Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

超薄Descemet膜剥离自动内皮角膜移植术与Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术治疗Fuchs内皮角膜营养不良的临床结果:系统评价和Meta分析

阅读:1

Abstract

In Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED), the corneal endothelial layer undergoes progressive degenerative changes leading to a reduction in endothelial cell count and subsequent visual impairment. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) are two established surgical approaches for the management of FED. This meta-analysis aims to compare postoperative clinical outcomes between DMEK and UT-DSAEK in adult patients with FED. A literature search was conducted in major peer-reviewed electronic databases. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) served as the primary outcome, while endothelial cell density (ECD) and postoperative complications were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Compared with UT-DSAEK, DMEK demonstrated a tendency toward better BCVA at one year, although it was also associated with a higher likelihood of requiring re-bubbling. No clear differences were observed between the two techniques regarding ECD at 12 months, while complication rates varied between studies. Overall, DMEK showed more favorable visual outcomes, whereas UT-DSAEK presented a lower complication burden. Although complications following DMEK are generally manageable, some may necessitate additional surgical procedures. Both techniques remain effective options for corneal surgeons treating patients with FED.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。