Surgical Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged >60 Years With Bicuspid Valve Stenosis: A Time-to-Event Data Meta-Analysis

外科手术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗60岁以上二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者的疗效比较:一项基于事件发生时间数据的荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis requires further evaluation, particularly as its use has become comparable to surgical aortic valve replacement. We sought to compare midterm outcomes of TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. METHODS: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials identified studies reporting TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement outcomes in patients aged ≥60 years with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. The primary analysis included only comparative studies with interpretable Kaplan-Meier curves. Individual patient data were reconstructed for time-to-event analysis. Sensitivity analyses incorporated noncomparative single-arm studies. Baseline differences and heterogeneity were addressed using landmark analysis, time-varying hazard ratios (HRs), frailty Cox models, and covariate-adjusted restricted mean survival time. The primary outcome was death with or without unplanned rehospitalization and stroke. RESULTS: Five comparative, risk-adjusted studies (TAVI, 5901; surgical aortic valve replacement, 12 427) were included. At 48-month follow-up, TAVI was associated with a higher hazard for adverse events (HR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.46-1.79]; P<0.0001 for the composite end point of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 48 months); landmark analysis showed an initial benefit with TAVI, followed by a reversal at 6 months that was maintained beyond 12 months (12-48 months; P<0.0001). Time-varying HRs confirmed this trend. Sensitivity analyses, including frailty Cox models on the full cohort and restricted mean survival time analysis, supported the robustness of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found limited midterm benefits (ie, 48 months) of TAVI in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. These findings should be interpreted considering patient selection, as younger patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis are increasingly referred for TAVI.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。