Balancing transition and readmission: a comparative study of low-dose vs standard buprenorphine initiation for medically managed opioid withdrawal

平衡过渡期和再入院:低剂量丁丙诺啡与标准剂量丁丙诺啡起始治疗在药物管理的阿片类药物戒断中的比较研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of fentanyl has complicated buprenorphine (BUP) initiation due to increased risks for precipitated withdrawal. Low-dose initiation (LDI), or "micro-dosing", has been proposed as an alternative to standard-dose initiation (SDI) to improve tolerability and engagement with care. This study aimed to compare inpatient and post-discharge outcomes of LDI versus SDI among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) undergoing medically managed withdrawal. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults admitted for medically managed OUD withdrawal during two time periods: SDI (February 2020-April 2021) and LDI (May 2021-August 2022). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment data were extracted from electronic medical records. Outcomes included inpatient length of stay (LOS), BUP acceptance and discharge dose, transition to rehabilitation, readmissions within one year, BUP refill rates, and outpatient treatment engagement. Analyses included logistic regression and negative binomial regression with adjustment for baseline urine drug screen results. RESULTS: The sample included 184 patients (127 SDI, 57 LDI) with a mean age of 37 years, predominately White N=140 (76.1%) and female. Groups were demographically similar. Inpatient outcomes did not differ in LOS, BUP acceptance, or discharge dose. The LDI group was less likely to transition to rehabilitation (26% vs 48%). LDI was associated with significantly lower odds of readmission within 1 year, while 30-day readmission rates showed a similar directional trend that did not reach statistical significance. Post-discharge BUP refill rates and outpatient attendance rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: LDI and SDI produced comparable outcomes across most measures, with LDI associated with fewer readmissions over one year. Both approaches appear to be viable strategies in the fentanyl era.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。