Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2021

2021年麻醉学教育研究批判性评价

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on a review of anesthesiology education articles published in 2021, the authors conducted a critical appraisal to describe trends in the literature, highlight innovations in the field, and identify high-yield articles for clinician educators in anesthesiology. METHODS: After a database search (3 Ovid MEDLINE databases, Embase.com, ERIC [via FirstSearch], PsycINFO [via EBSCOhost], and PubMed), abstracts were screened by 2 independent reviewers based on inclusion criteria. Articles representing publications in both anesthesiology-specific journals and general medical education journals were included via manual search. Three randomly assigned raters reviewed and scored each quantitative article using a rubric. Two raters scored qualitative studies using a separate rubric designed for qualitative studies. Each article also received an overall quality rating used to create an additional list of recommended articles. RESULTS: The database search identified 1141 articles and an additional manual search identified 1497 articles. Of these, 67 articles met the inclusion criteria (61 quantitative, 6 qualitative). This article reports and summarizes the top 13 quantitative articles and top 2 qualitative papers. CONCLUSIONS: This year we did not see as many articles describing curriculum to teach learners procedures, a topic heavily present in previous years. Also, analysis revealed an increase in articles focused on nontechnical skill education and a trend toward how to assess learner performance. Finally, 2 articles focused on gender issues in anesthesiology, an emerging area of interest.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。