Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the differences in IVF outcomes between couples with obstructive azoospermia (OA), non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), and male factor (MF). METHODS: Using the SART CORS data from 2016 to 2017, we included all initial autologous cycles with a diagnosis of male factor with ejaculated and surgically obtained sperm. We analyzed 71,121 cycles, including 3467 with a diagnosis of azoospermia and 67,654 with other non-azoospermic MF. Using a multivariate binomial regression, we estimated adjusted risk ratios comparing outcomes for ICSI cycles using surgically acquired (OA and NOA) versus ejaculated sperm (MF). Outcomes reported per initial cycle included clinical pregnancy, live birth, biochemical pregnancy, and miscarriage. Outcomes reported per singleton pregnancy included full-term delivery (≥ 37 weeks), normal birth weight (≥ 2500 g), and delivery method. RESULTS: After frozen embryo transfers (FET), patients with NOA had 7% higher odds of live birth compared to MF (aOR 1.23 (0.94-1.74)), and those with OA had 2.6% lower chance of live birth compared to MF (aOR 0.73 (95%CI 0.5-1.05)). After fresh ET, patients with NOA had 5% higher chance of live birth (aOR 1.11 (0.9-1.36)), and those with OA had a 2.5% higher chance of live birth (aOR 1.10 (95%CI 0.89-1.34)) compared to MF. All three subgroups had lower fresh live birth rates (LBR) compared to FETs. CONCLUSION: Couples with either NOA or OA have overall comparable ART and perinatal outcomes to couples with MF, and their success is primarily dependent on both patient's and partner's age.