Abstract
BACKGROUND: A new locking screw technology, named variable fixation, has been developed aiming at promoting bone callus formation providing initial rigid fixation followed by progressive fracture gap dynamisation. In this study, we compared bone callus formation in osteotomies stabilized with standard locking fixation against that of osteotomies stabilized with variable fixation in an established tibia ovine model. METHODS: A 3 mm tibial transverse osteotomy gap was stabilized in three groups of six female sheep each with a locking plate and either 1) standard fixation in both segments (group LS) or 2) variable fixation in the proximal and standard fixation in the distal bone segment (group VFLS(3)) or 3) variable fixation in both segments (group VFLS(6)). The implantation site and fracture healing were compared between groups by means of radiologic, micro tomographic, biomechanical, and histological investigations. RESULTS: Compared to LS callus, VFLS(3) callus was 40% larger and about 3% denser, while VFLS(6) callus was 93% larger and its density about 7.2% lower. VFLS(3) showed 65% and VFLS(6) 163% larger amount of callus at the cis-cortex. There wasn't a significant difference in the amount of callus at the cis and trans-cortex in groups featuring variable fixation only. Investigated biomechanical variables were not significantly different among groups and histology showed comparable good healing in all groups. Tissues adjacent to the implants did not show any alteration of the normal structure in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Variable fixation promoted the formation of a larger amount of bone callus, equally distributed at the cis and trans cortices. The histological and biomechanical properties of the variable fixation callus were equivalent to those of the standard fixation callus. The magnitude of variable fixation had a biological effect on the formation of bone callus. At the implantation site, the usage of variable fixation did not raise additional concerns with respect to standard fixation. The formation of a larger amount of mature callus suggests that fractures treated with variable fixation might have a higher probability to bridge the fracture gap. The conditions where its usage can be most beneficial for patients needs to be clinically defined.