Abstract
BACKGROUND: Funding agencies, publishers, and other stakeholders are pushing environmental health science investigators to improve data sharing; to promote the findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) principles; and to increase the rigor and reproducibility of the data collected. Accomplishing these goals will require significant cultural shifts surrounding data management and strategies to develop robust and reliable resources that bridge the technical challenges and gaps in expertise. OBJECTIVE: In this commentary, we examine the current state of managing data and metadata-referred to collectively as (meta)data-in the experimental environmental health sciences. We introduce new tools and resources based on in vivo experiments to serve as examples for the broader field. METHODS: We discuss previous and ongoing efforts to improve (meta)data collection and curation. These include global efforts by the Functional Genomics Data Society to develop metadata collection tools such as the Investigation, Study, Assay (ISA) framework, and the Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrieval. We also conduct a case study of in vivo data deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus that demonstrates the current state of in vivo environmental health data and highlights the value of using the tools we propose to support data deposition. DISCUSSION: The environmental health science community has played a key role in efforts to achieve the goals of the FAIR guiding principles and is well positioned to advance them further. We present a proposed framework to further promote these objectives and minimize the obstacles between data producers and data scientists to maximize the return on research investments. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11484.