Exercise empowerment: a scoping review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental physical activity interventions

运动赋能:随机对照试验和准实验性体育活动干预的范围综述

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is a leading contributor to chronic disease and premature mortality across the globe. Traditional physical activity interventions often promote physical activity initiation but have limited long-term effectiveness. Empowerment has been recognized as a potentially powerful tool in health behavior change, but it is unclear how empowerment is operationalized in physical activity interventions. One current gap in the literature is the role of empowerment in physical activity interventions. Therefore, this review aims to determine how exercise empowerment is defined, measured, and theoretically framed in randomized controlled trials and quasi-experiments across various populations. We are also interested in understanding the strategies for facilitating empowerment, whether empowering interventions increase physical activity, and if physical activity outcomes are assessed. METHODS: A scoping review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews was conducted across five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL). Inclusion criteria included adults and children, participation in a physical activity intervention, and an empowerment strategy. Exclusion criteria included qualitative studies, studies published before 1994, and studies not in English. RESULTS: Forty papers were included in this scoping review, but no interventions explicitly defined exercise empowerment. Empowerment was not directly measured in any of the included interventions. Empowerment theory or a derivative informed nine (22.5%) of the included articles, while six (15%) lacked theoretical underpinnings. Most interventions (55%) utilized an educational approach. Physical activity was measured subjectively in 27 (67.5%) interventions. Physical activity increased in most studies (n = 29; 72.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the disconnect between the multidimensional framework of empowerment theory and interventions designed to empower participants. We identified several opportunities to increase intervention effectiveness, including developing and applying a consensus definition of exercise empowerment that creates better alignment with empowerment theory. Exercise empowerment should be defined as the perceived confidence and control over exercise choices that lead to sustained exercise and a sense of fulfillment. It can be experienced both individually and collectively. The process of building exercise empowerment depends on developing personal confidence and control over exercise choices, engaging with supportive social networks to initiate and sustain exercise, and utilizing available community-based exercise resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-025-01859-9.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。