What kind of urban-rural basic public services can affect the urban-rural income gap?-an analysis of FsQCA based on the TOE framework

哪些城乡基本公共服务能够影响城乡收入差距?——基于TOE框架的FsQCA分析

阅读:6

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The urban-rural income gap and the non-equalization of basic public services constitute the core contradiction in China's urban-rural development. METHODS: This study employs the fsQCA method based on the TOE framework to determine how technological, organizational, and environmental conditions collectively shape the urban-rural income gap in China's Yangtze River Delta region. RESULTS: The findings reveal three distinct configurations of high income disparity and three distinct configurations of non-high income disparity, emphasizing that no single factor is indispensable. Rather, combinations are crucial. High-disparity configurations manifest through three divergent pathways: dual squeezes from fiscal constraints and lagging digital infrastructure; structural disconnect between economic growth and digitalization; and cyclical lock-in between low-level economies and public service shortages. Non-high-disparity configurations emerge via three equivalent pathways: factor rebalancing driven by high economic output; cross-regional coordination through institutional optimization and digital empowerment; and compensatory mechanisms based on fiscal resilience and governance innovation. DISCUSSION: The study offers recommendations for basic public service allocation across cities in China's three major regions, holding significant implications for the integrated urban-rural development of China.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。