Abstract
Background/Objectives: Radiography is an essential and low-cost diagnostic method in pulmonary medicine that is used for the early detection and monitoring of lung diseases. An adequate and consistent image quality (IQ) is crucial to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective patient management. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)'s remote and automated quality control (QC) methodology, which has been tested in multiple imaging centers. Methods: The data, collected between April and December 2022, included 47 longitudinal data sets from 22 digital radiographic units. Participants submitted metadata on the radiography setup, exposure parameters, and imaging modes. The database comprised 968 exposures, each representing multiple image quality parameters and metadata of image acquisition parameters. Python scripts were developed to collate, analyze, and visualize image quality data. Results: The pilot survey identified several critical issues affecting the future implementation of the IAEA method, as follows: (1) difficulty in accessing raw images due to manufacturer restrictions, (2) variability in IQ parameters even among identical X-ray systems and image acquisitions, (3) inconsistencies in phantom construction affecting IQ values, (4) vendor-dependent DICOM tag reporting, and (5) large variability in SNR values compared to other IQ metrics, making SNR less reliable for image quality assessment. Conclusions: Cross-comparisons among radiography systems must be taken with cautious because of the dependence on phantom construction and acquisition mode variations. Awareness of these factors will generate reliable and standardized quality control programs, which are crucial for accurate and fair evaluations, especially in high-frequency chest imaging.