Abstract
The (co)representation of time and numerosity has long been a topic of enduring interest. While a theory of magnitude (ATOM) posits that these dimensions are governed by a shared representational system, empirical findings offer both supporting and conflicting evidence. Previous challenging research has highlighted that time and numerosity perception can be distorted in opposite directions by explicitly introducing emotional or cognitive interference. However, it remains unclear whether time and numerosity can spontaneously dissociate during stimulus processing. To this end, we tested the time and numerosity distortions caused by different kinds of chunked stimuli, including collinearity, illusory contours (ICs), and biological motion (BM). The results showed that collinearity caused the same amount of overestimation for both time and numerosity, whereas ICs caused only numerosity underestimation and BM caused only time overestimation. Notably, no consistent correlations emerged between the magnitudes of temporal and numerical distortion across the three stimulus types. These findings suggest that time and numerosity perception can be symmetrically or asymmetrically distorted depending on the nature of chunked stimuli, providing converging evidence for partially dissociable representations of time and numerosity. The close relationship observed between these two dimensions may instead reflect shared constraints within a broader framework of information processing.