Accurate Prostate Volumes from Manual Calculations-A Comparison of PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Measurement Techniques

手动计算前列腺体积的精确性——PI-RADS v2 和 v2.1 测量技术的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

There is a theoretical risk of volume overestimation if prostate AP dimension is taken on axial imaging given the anatomic obliquity of the gland on axial plane. This is analogous to slicing a salami sausage diagonally rather than perpendicularly to obtain larger slices. The most recent PI-RADS update (v2.1) now recommends obtaining the anterior-posterior measurement on sagittal imaging to mitigate the theoretical risk of the so called "salami effect" when using the ellipsoid formula for volume calculations. The authors of the recent article Comparison of PI-RADS Versions 2.0 and 2.1 for MRI-based Calculation of the Prostate Volume found the theoretical "salami effect" may not be as significant as originally thought, and perhaps slight overestimation of the AP diameter on axial measurements may yield more accurate volume estimates. Future validation studies are needed for to validate their findings. In this contemporary study, there is excellent interreader agreement among radiologist' three dimensional measurements-confirming manual calculation can be reliably replicated in practice settings where of software-based segmentation tools are not available.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。