Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: On unenhanced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), computing or synthesizing high b-value images from lower b-value acquisitions can enhance breast cancer visibility. This study aimed to evaluate relative lesion conspicuity on computed versus acquired diffusion-weighted images and investigate clinical characteristics influencing optimal b-values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women with newly diagnosed breast cancer were prospectively enrolled and underwent 3T breast MRI with DWI. Lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured across a range of b-values (0-2500 s/mm(2)) for computed and acquired DWI. Three readers independently compared lesion visibility between computed and acquired DWI and selected the optimal b-value. Computed versus acquired DWI was compared quantitatively based on CNR by paired t-test and qualitatively based on reader preference using a sign test. Optimal b-values by qualitative and quantitative assessment were compared by paired t-test, and associations with clinical characteristics were assessed by Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: The study included 30 women (median age, 48 years); 28 with invasive carcinoma, 2 DCIS. Lesion CNR was higher on acquired versus computed images (p = 0.018), while lesion visibility by reader assessment was not different (p = 0.36). Optimal b-values selected by readers (mean, b = 1411 ± 383 s/mm(2)) were slightly higher than those based on peak CNR (b = 1233 ± 463 s/mm(2), p = 0.023), and were higher for younger (≤50 years) versus older women (p = 0.002) and dense versus nondense breasts (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Lesion CNR on computed high b-value images was slightly reduced versus acquired images, but our study suggests that this did not significantly impact lesion visibility. Computing high b-value images offers extra flexibility to adjust b-value during interpretation.