Abstract
There are published data describing impairments in the brain function of adolescents or young adults who have a genetic or familial predisposition for obesity. From these descriptions, it is often assumed that the impairments are appropriately captured by a central tendency estimate and therefore consistently detectable. The present study questions this assumption and shows that the variability in brain function over the time course of a cognitive task is a better predictor of familial risk than its central tendency. Sixty-nine female young adults lacking an obese parent and 24 female young adults with an obese parent were compared on the average amplitude and inter-trial variability (ITV) in amplitude of their P300 electroencephalographic responses to rarely-occurring stimuli during a selective attention task. Simple group comparisons revealed statistically significant findings with effect sizes that were markedly greater for analyses of P300 ITV versus P300 average amplitude. It is suggested that the elevation in P300 ITV among young adults with familial risk indicates temporal instability in systems responsible for the maintenance of attention. These fluctuations may episodically disrupt their attention to satiety cues as well as other cues that influence behavior regulation.