Pancreatectomy with arterial resection following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX: A single-institution experience

新辅助FOLFIRINOX方案化疗后行胰腺切除联合动脉切除术:单中心经验

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Arterial resection in pancreatic cancer remains controversial. This study evaluates outcomes of pancreatic resection with arterial involvement following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 100 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients undergoing resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (2010-2024): 26 with arterial resection (ArP), 39 with portal-venous resection (PoP), and 35 without vascular involvement (NoP). Primary outcomes included perioperative morbidity, mortality, and survival. RESULTS: ArP patients had significantly more stage III disease (73.1% vs 58.9% vs 28.6%, p < 0.001) but achieved acceptable R0 resection rates (76.9% vs 84.6% vs 91.4%, p = 0.04). ArP procedures required longer operative time (386 ± 71 minutes), greater blood loss (1,100 ± 560 mL), and more transfusions (57.7%; all p < 0.001). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) were higher in ArP (26.9% vs 21.6% vs 8.6%, p = 0.03), with extended ICU stays (3.5 ± 1.5 vs 2.0 ± 1.0 vs 1.0 ± 0.5 days). Ninety-day mortality was 0% (ArP), 2.5% (PoP), and 5.7% (NoP) (p = 0.78). Despite shorter disease-free survival in ArP (7.4 vs 9.7 vs 13.2 months, p = 0.01), median overall survival was comparable (ArP: 19.1, PoP: 18.3, NoP: 22.7 months; p = 0.0652). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial resection following neoadjuvant therapy in selected pancreatic cancer patients demonstrates acceptable perioperative risk and achieves survival outcomes comparable to less advanced cases. This approach is justified in experienced high-volume centers for appropriately selected patients with favorable response to neoadjuvant therapy, offering potential cure in rare circumstances.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。