Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The indications for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for advanced-stage lung cancer are expanding, but the criteria vary among institutions. This study compared the minimal invasiveness and oncologic validity of VATS lobectomy and thoracotomy lobectomy for the treatment of large-diameter primary lung cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical features and surgical outcomes of 68 patients who underwent anatomical pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer of >5-cm diameter from July 2006 to March 2013. The patients were divided into a VATS group (Group V, n = 35) and a thoracotomy group (Group T, n = 33). RESULTS: Group V exhibited less intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.012) and had a shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.024). The 1- and 5-year overall survival rates were 91.3% and 39.3% in Group V and 84.8% and 56.9% in Group T, respectively (p = 0.48). Multivariate analysis showed that limited lymph node dissection contributed to local recurrence. The extraction bag lavage cytology in Group V revealed that the positivity rate was 35.7%. CONCLUSIONS: VATS for primary lung cancer of >5-cm diameter is similar to thoracotomy in terms of surgical outcomes. Large tumors must be carefully maneuvered during VATS to prevent cancer cell spillage.