Comparison of laparotomy, laparoscopy, and da Vinci in Whipple, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, and gastrectomy

比较开腹手术、腹腔镜手术和达芬奇机器人辅助手术在惠普尔手术、肝切除术、胰腺切除术和胃切除术中的应用

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether advances in surgical imaging and technology improve clinical outcomes, including operative time, hospital stay, and intraoperative bleeding, across four major hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgeries: the Whipple procedure, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, and gastrectomy, comparing open laparotomy, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted (da Vinci) approaches. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using a prospectively maintained database from a university-affiliated minimally invasive surgery center. A total of 486 patients (269 males, 217 females; mean age 57.96 ± 15.71 years) who underwent HPB surgery between July 2015 and September 2019 were included. Surgical method selection was determined by surgeon preference, patient condition, and the chronological introduction of the da Vinci system. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare operative time, hospital stay, and blood loss among the three methods in each surgical category. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed among surgical approaches. In gastrectomy, hospital stay [F(2,158) = 18.66, P < 0.001] and bleeding [F(2,158) = 16.25, P < 0.001] were significantly lower in laparoscopic and robotic groups. In pancreatectomy, operative time [F(2,80) = 3.48, P = 0.04] and bleeding [F(2,80) = 3.16, P = 0.05] showed significant variation, with longer duration in laparoscopy. In the Whipple procedure, only operative time differed [F(1,76) = 26.53, P < 0.001]. In hepatectomy, operative time [F(2,161) = 3.48, P = 0.03], hospital stay [F(2,161) = 11.53, P< 0.001], and bleeding [F(2,161) = 18.29, P < 0.001] were significantly improved in minimally invasive and robotic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgeries significantly reduced hospital stay and intraoperative bleeding compared with open laparotomy. Operative time varied across procedures, reflecting technical complexity and learning curves. These findings highlight the clinical benefits of image-guided and robotic-assisted techniques in complex abdominal surgery.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。