Abstract
Lung nodule tracking assessment relies on cross-sectional measurements of the largest lesion profile depicted in initial and follow-up computed tomography (CT) images. However, apparent changes in nodule size assessed via simple image-based measurements may also be compromised by the effect of the background lung tissue deformation on the GGN between the initial and follow-up images, leading to erroneous conclusions about nodule changes due to disease. To compensate for the lung deformation and enable consistent nodule tracking, here we propose a feature-based affine registration method and study its performance vis-a-vis several other registration methods. We implement and test each registration method using both a lung- and a lesion-centered region of interest on ten patient CT datasets featuring twelve nodules, including both benign and malignant GGO lesions containing pure GGNs, part-solid, or solid nodules. We evaluate each registration method according to the target registration error (TRE) computed across 30 - 50 homologous fiducial landmarks surrounding the lesions and selected by expert radiologists in both the initial and follow-up patient CT images. Our results show that the proposed feature-based affine lesion-centered registration yielded a 1.1 ± 1.2 mm TRE, while a Symmetric Normalization deformable registration yielded a 1.2 ± 1.2 mm TRE, and a least-square fit registration of the 30-50 validation fiducial landmark set yielded a 1.5 ± 1.2 mm TRE. Although the deformable registration yielded a slightly higher registration accuracy than the feature-based affine registration, it is significantly more computationally efficient, eliminates the need for ambiguous segmentation of GGNs featuring ill-defined borders, and reduces the susceptibility of artificial deformations introduced by the deformable registration, which may lead to increased similarity between the registered initial and follow-up images, over-compensating for the background lung tissue deformation, and, in turn, compromising the true disease-induced nodule change assessment. We also assessed the registration qualitatively, by visual inspection of the subtraction images, and conducted a pilot pre-clinical study that showed the proposed feature-based lesion-centered affine registration effectively compensates for the background lung tissue deformation between the initial and follow-up images and also serves as a reliable baseline registration method prior to assessing lung nodule changes due to disease.