The Impact of Viral Concentration Method on Quantification and Long Amplicon Nanopore Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 and Noroviruses in Wastewater

病毒浓缩方法对废水中SARS-CoV-2和诺如病毒定量及长扩增子纳米孔测序的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

Wastewater-based surveillance has gained attention in the four years following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Accurate pathogen detection, quantification and characterisation rely on the selection of appropriate methodologies. Here, we explore the impact of viral concentration method on RT-qPCR inhibition and quantification of norovirus genogroups I and II (GI and GII), crAssphage, phi6 and SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, their impact on long amplicon sequencing for typing noroviruses and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) SARS-CoV-2 was explored. RT-qPCR inhibition for each viral concentration method was significantly different apart from the two ultrafiltration methods, InnovaPrep(®) concentrating pipette (IP) and Vivaspin(®) (VS) centrifugal concentrators. Using an ultrafiltration method reduced inhibition by 62.0% to 96.0% compared to the ammonium sulphate (AS) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation-based methods. Viral quantification was significantly impacted by concentration method with the highest concentrations (copies/L) observed for VS with 7.2- to 83.2-fold differences from AS depending on the target. Norovirus long amplicon sequencing showed genotype-dependent differences with IP performing best for GI and VS for GII although IP performance gains for GI were relatively small. VS outperformed AS and IP across all metrics during SARS-CoV-2 WGS. Overall, VS performed the best when considering all the areas of investigation.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。