Association of the Glycated Albumin-to-Glycated Haemoglobin Ratio With Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

糖化白蛋白/糖化血红蛋白比值与2型糖尿病患者死亡率的相关性:一项回顾性队列分析

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The glycated albumin-to-glycated haemoglobin (GA/HbA1c) ratio is a potential marker of glycaemic variability; however, its association with adverse clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether the GA/HbA1c ratio is a better predictor of mortality and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression than GA alone in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis included 571 Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes who were stratified into tertiles based on their GA/HbA1c ratio. Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations between the GA/HbA1c ratio and mortality or CKD progression (≥ 30% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]), adjusting for age, sex, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, eGFR, body mass index, haemoglobin and serum albumin. RESULTS: In this cohort, the median age was 67 years, and 53.9% were male. During the median follow-up of 5.4 and 5.3 years for mortality and CKD progression, respectively, 40 (7.0%) participants died and 70 (12.3%) experienced CKD progression. For mortality, the GA/HbA1c ratio demonstrated a U-shaped association: although both the lowest (T1) and highest (T3) tertiles showed higher mortality risks than the middle tertile (T2), this association was significant for only T3 (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.05-2.04). Neither GA nor HbA1c alone was significantly associated with mortality. For CKD progression, GA alone showed a U-shaped association, with both T1 and T3 exhibiting non-significantly higher risks than T2. Neither the GA/HbA1c ratio nor HbA1c alone was associated with CKD progression. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with type 2 diabetes, a higher GA/HbA1c ratio was associated with an increased risk of mortality but not with CKD progression. However, given the retrospective design and limited sample size, these findings should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in larger, prospective studies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。