Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Identifying tuberculosis infection (TBI) using interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) is a primary component of clinical and public health efforts to prevent pediatric tuberculosis (TB). Pediatric data comparing the 2 IGRAs in the United States are very limited. We compared the performance of the 2 IGRAs among a large pediatric cohort tested for TBI and assessed whether discordance might be due to quantitative results close to test cutoff values. METHODS: Children aged 0-15 years with both T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) tests were identified from a US multicenter study enrolling people at elevated risk of TBI or progression to TB disease. Results were compared using McNemar's Chi-square tests with stratification by age category and testing reason. Percent agreement and kappa statistics were also calculated. We characterized quantitative test results among children with discordant QFT-GIT-positive/T-SPOT-negative results. RESULTS: Among 3793 children, a higher number had positive QFT-GIT than T-SPOT (10.1% vs 7.4%, P < .001). This difference was noted for all age categories except <2 years, and for children with close-contact and non-close contact test indications. Among discordant QFT-GIT-positive/T-SPOT-negative children, lowering the positive threshold for T-SPOT to include borderline spot counts (5-7) did not eliminate the discordance, nor were QFT-GIT antigen-minus-nil results concentrated in the range just above the standard cutoff of 0.35 IU/mL. CONCLUSIONS: In a large pediatric cohort tested for TBI, QFT-GIT had a higher proportion of positive results than T-SPOT, and discordance was not related to quantitative results close to the established diagnostic cutoffs.