Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the regulatory framework governing policies on rapid/alternative access to medicines (expanded access and compassionate use) in South American countries. METHOD: An exploratory descriptive study with analysis of documents was performed. In addition to a literature review, official rules issued by regulatory agencies were reviewed if available. Information was collected on how countries define the concepts of expanded access and compassionate use, clinical phase in which the medicine becomes available for these alternative uses, and role of physicians and sponsors. RESULTS: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Peru, and Uruguay were included in the study. The information obtained revealed that the regulatory scenario is more structured in Argentina and Brazil than in the other countries. In Chile, rules on expanded access and compassionate use are available, however without an explicit definition of these concepts. In Peru and Uruguay, important definitions are missing regarding expanded access. The search did not reveal any databases with information on expanded access and compassionate use programs, supporting the notion that empirical data to evaluate the results of these policies are lacking. CONCLUSIONS: All the countries analyzed have a regulatory framework that contemplates rapid/alternative access to medicines by patients at risk. However, databases and transparent information are lacking, preventing a snapshot of the medicines covered and patients benefiting from alternative access programs and assessments of these policies in South America.