Abstract
A root factor for the accuracy of all quantum chemical calculations of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shifts is the quality of the molecular equilibrium geometry used. In turn, this quality depends largely on the basis set employed at the geometry optimization stage. This parameter represents the main subject of the present study, which is a continuation of our recent work, where new pecG-n (n = 1, 2) basis sets for the geometry optimization were introduced. A goal of this study was to compare the performance of our geometry-oriented pecG-n (n = 1, 2) basis sets against the other basis sets in massive calculations of (13)C NMR shielding constants/chemical shifts in terms of their efficacy in reducing geometry factor errors. The testing was carried out with both large-sized biologically active natural products and medium-sized compounds with complicated electronic structures. The former were treated using the computation protocol based on the density functional theory (DFT) and considered in the theoretical benchmarking, while the latter were treated using the computational scheme based on the upper-hierarchy coupled cluster (CC) methods and were used in the practical benchmarking involving the comparison with experimental NMR data. Both the theoretical and practical analyses showed that the pecG-1 and pecG-2 basis sets resulted in substantially reduced geometry factor errors in the calculated (13)C NMR chemical shifts/shielding constants compared to their commensurate analogs, with the pecG-2 basis set being the best of all the considered basis sets.