Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the placement accuracy and reproducibility of Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) compared with the conventional tattoo/laser method in patients undergoing radiotherapy for abdominal malignancies. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients treated with either SGRT (Group A) or the tattoo/laser technique (Group B). Patients in both groups underwent CBCT to quantify the positioning shifts in the vertical (Svrt), lateral (Slat) and longitudinal (Slng) axes, as well as the total shift. Statistical indicators including median, interquartile range (IQR), and range were calculated, and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed due to non-normal data distribution. Median values in all axes were same between groups: Svrt = 0.4 cm, Slat = 0.2 cm, Slng = 0.4 cm. Group A showed a higher total median shift equal to 0.8 cm versus 0.7 cm of Group B. However, IQRs were smaller in the Group B for all directions and total shift, indicating greater method consistency. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in all axes, except the vertical. These findings suggest that, while SGRT achieves comparable median alignment, its use in a highly variable anatomical region such as the abdomen may be associated with greater setup variability.