Abstract
The aim of this study was to improve screening efficiency by establishing reasonable interpretation criteria for the use of flow injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry (FIA-MS/MS) in newborn screening (NBS) for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD). FIA-MS/MS was employed to analyze very-long-chain acylcarnitines (ACs) and lysophosphatidylcholines (LPCs) and their ratios in dried blood spot (DBS) obtained from five X-ALD patients in the neonatal period (0-7 days old) and 7123 healthy neonate controls. By comparing these results and analyzing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we identified sensitive indicators for X-ALD screening in newborns. To evaluate the performance of different FIA-MS/MS screening indicators, we simultaneously analyzed 7712 neonatal DBS samples obtained for X-ALD screening using FIA-MS/MS and the established liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for quantitative detection of C26:0-lysophosphatidylcholine (C26:0-LPC). Furthermore, 84,268 newborn X-ALD screening results were retrospectively analyzed to further evaluate the screening performance of FIA-MS/MS. After the three-step optimization evaluation, the optimized first-tier sensitive screening indicators of FIA-MS/MS were C24:0-AC, C26:0LPC, and C24:0/C22:0-AC. Among the 7712 newborns screened, one case was confirmed to be double-positive. Within separate statistical analyses, based on LC-MS/MS screening alone (positive cutoff > 0.17 µmol/L), only seven cases (0.09%) were initially positive, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 42.8%, and two additional ABCD1 VUS hemizygous males were detected. Through the retrospective analysis of 84,268 newborns, eight ABCD1 variants (six hemizygous males and two heterozygous females) were ultimately identified. Our study showed that the optimization of first-tier screening performance is particularly important if second-tier screening is not performed. Using LC-MS/MS for second-tier screening for X-ALD can significantly reduce the number of false positives, but the method still misses some false negatives. If it is used as a first-tier assessment, more VUS variant neonates can be detected.