Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 刺突蛋白的病毒学特征

阅读:8
作者:Daichi Yamasoba,Izumi Kimura,Hesham Nasser,Yuhei Morioka,Naganori Nao,Jumpei Ito,Keiya Uriu,Masumi Tsuda,Jiri Zahradnik,Kotaro Shirakawa,Rigel Suzuki,Mai Kishimoto,Yusuke Kosugi,Kouji Kobiyama,Teppei Hara,Mako Toyoda,Yuri L Tanaka,Erika P Butlertanaka,Ryo Shimizu,Hayato Ito,Lei Wang,Yoshitaka Oda,Yasuko Orba,Michihito Sasaki,Kayoko Nagata,Kumiko Yoshimatsu,Hiroyuki Asakura,Mami Nagashima,Kenji Sadamasu,Kazuhisa Yoshimura,Jin Kuramochi,Motoaki Seki,Ryoji Fujiki,Atsushi Kaneda,Tadanaga Shimada,Taka-Aki Nakada,Seiichiro Sakao,Takuji Suzuki,Takamasa Ueno,Akifumi Takaori-Kondo,Ken J Ishii,Gideon Schreiber

Abstract

Soon after the emergence and global spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineage BA.1, another Omicron lineage, BA.2, began outcompeting BA.1. The results of statistical analysis showed that the effective reproduction number of BA.2 is 1.4-fold higher than that of BA.1. Neutralization experiments revealed that immunity induced by COVID vaccines widely administered to human populations is not effective against BA.2, similar to BA.1, and that the antigenicity of BA.2 is notably different from that of BA.1. Cell culture experiments showed that the BA.2 spike confers higher replication efficacy in human nasal epithelial cells and is more efficient in mediating syncytia formation than the BA.1 spike. Furthermore, infection experiments using hamsters indicated that the BA.2 spike-bearing virus is more pathogenic than the BA.1 spike-bearing virus. Altogether, the results of our multiscale investigations suggest that the risk of BA.2 to global health is potentially higher than that of BA.1.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。