Abstract
Relapse of paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) may occur due to persistence of resistant cells with leukaemia-propagating ability (LPC). In leukaemia, the balance of B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) family proteins is disrupted, promoting survival of malignant cells and possibly LPC. A direct comparison of BCL-2 inhibitors, navitoclax and venetoclax, was undertaken on LPC subpopulations from B-cell precursor (BCP) and T-cell ALL (T-ALL) cases in vitro and in vivo. Responses were compared to BCL-2 levels detected by microarray analyses and Western blotting. In vitro, both drugs were effective against most BCP-ALL LPC, except CD34(-) /CD19(-) cells. In contrast, only navitoclax was effective in T-ALL and CD34(-) /CD7(-) LPC were resistant to both drugs. In vivo, navitoclax was more effective than venetoclax, significantly improving survival of mice engrafted with BCP- and T-ALL samples. Venetoclax was not particularly effective against T-ALL cases in vivo. The proportions of CD34(+) /CD19(-) , CD34(-) /CD19(-) BCP-ALL cells and CD34(-) /CD7(-) T-ALL cells increased significantly following in vivo treatment. Expression of pro-apoptotic BCL-2 genes was lower in these subpopulations, which may explain the lack of sensitivity. These data demonstrate that some LPC were resistant to BCL-2 inhibitors and sustained remission will require their use in combination with other therapeutics.