Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has been recommended as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A phase III study (AENEAS) to assess the efficacy and safety of aumolertinib, another third-generation EGFR-TKI, vs. gefitinib as a first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations has also achieved positive results. Despite the improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of third- vs. first-generation EGFR-TKIs, combined treatment strategies to postpone drug resistance and further prolong survival benefits remain to be explored. METHODS: We conducted a nonrandomized phase II trial (ChiCTR2000035140) of an oral multitarget antiangiogenic TKI (anlotinib) with third-generation EGFR-TKIs (osimertinib or aumolertinib) in untreated patients with EGFR mutation and advanced NSCLC. Anlotinib and the third-generation EGFR-TKIs were orally administrated (anlotinib at a dose of 12 mg once every other day and osimertinib at 80 mg once daily or aumolertinib at 110 mg once daily). The primary end point of the study was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), OS, PFS, and safety of the combined treatment. RESULTS: Enrollment was ceased due to treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) after 11 of 35 planned patients were treated. Among these 11 patients, two were lost to follow-up, and the treatment of five of the remaining nine patients was discontinued due to trAEs, including stomachache, rash, hyponatremia, pulmonary embolism, and interstitial pneumonia. AEs of grade 3 or worse were observed in five patients, but no treatment-related death occurred in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Combining anlotinib and third-generation EGFR-TKIs in untreated EGFR-mutant patients with advanced NSCLC demonstrated significantly increased toxicity, suggesting that the combined treatment strategy was an inappropriate therapeutic choice in this setting.