Central hemodynamics and cardiovascular risk in nondippers

非杓型血压患者的中心血流动力学和心血管风险

阅读:1

Abstract

Failure of blood pressure (BP) to decline appropriately overnight (nondipping) is associated with increased risk. This may be due to inappropriately raised supine central BP and this study's first aim was to examine this hypothesis. Secondly, aortic stiffness, central hemodynamics, and left ventricular (LV) mass were measured as other possible mechanisms of higher risk. Brachial and central BP (supine and seated), aortic stiffness, central hemodynamics, and LV dimensions were measured in 95 patients with hypertension (mean age 62 ± 8 standard deviation). Central hemodynamics were recorded by combined radial tonometry and 3-dimensional echocardiography. Seated brachial and central systolic BP (SBP) were similar between dippers (n = 52) and nondippers (n = 43). However, nondippers had higher supine brachial (132 ± 14 mm Hg vs 126 ± 11 mm Hg; P = .029) and central (121 ± 15 mm Hg vs 115 ± 11 mm Hg; P = .024) SBP. Aortic stiffness was not different between groups (P = .76), but LV mass index (33.0 ± 6.2 vs 29.4±7.2 g/m(2.7) ; P=.019), stroke volume index (30.2 ± 6.2 mL/m(2) vs 27.4 ± 6.0 mL/m(2) ; P = .040), and LV stroke work (3246 ± 815 mm Hg/mL/m(2) vs 2778 ± 615 mm Hg/mL/m(2) ; P = .005) were all higher in nondippers. Dipper status independently predicted LV mass index (β = 3.61; P = .001). Nondippers have higher supine brachial and central SBP, significantly different central hemodynamics, and elevated LV mass index compared with dippers. These cardiovascular anomalies possibly contribute to increased mortality risk.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。